Furthermore, qBittorrent has more regular updates than Deluge, which makes it slightly safer. Deluge: Good, but 2. The competition is tough, but qBittorrent is clearly better in many ways. Deluge is written in Python and it doesn't even come close to Transmission's performance. BiglyBT (former Vuze/Azureus) is Java-based, memory usage is unpredictable and should only be judged on a bigger sample size. host : The IP address (or domain name) and the port. I don't understand how, because Transmission is written in C and Objective-C, while qBittorrent is in C++ and Python but I haven't checked out which parts are which. For qBittorrent/Transmission/Torrent, this program works with your clients WebUI. I don't know about long term stability but performance seems to be heavily in favor of qBittorrent.
#QBITTORRENT VS DELUGE UTORRENT#
Since only the Pro version of uTorrent gives you an ad-free experience, the. Transmission maxed out around 7.5 MB/s while qBittorrent hit 9.6 MB/s and hovering around 8.5-9 MB/s.įor qBittorrent I used but it also supports other clients as well like Transmission. While uTorrent has adware, Deluge is a freeware app.
I tested with both ubuntu-18.04.5-desktop-amd64.iso and ubuntu-20.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso official torrents. Right now I'm testing qBittorrent and have to say, I'm impressed. I have a 100 Mbps connection (soon 1 Gbps) and can't max it out while the CPU is burning at 100%. Deluge is ranked 3rd while µTorrent is ranked 20th.
For the longest period I used Transmission on it but I'm not completely satisfied with it's performance. I'm using Netgear ReadyNas 102 for Plex, CouchPotato, SickChill.
0 kommentar(er)
